Rich scope, weak document
Integrations, assumptions, and phases vanish into generic text. Finance sees a number; engineering does not see assumptions—so nobody signs with confidence.
Fyrmo aligns presales and delivery: AI for scope and phases, batch send to multiple accounts, presentation mode with stakeholders, section-level read tracking, AI chatbot in the link, acceptance, your contract template, Pix, and recurring agreements. Less drift between demo and delivery.
Free plan, no card · From technical scope to contract and payment
Rafael · IT
online
We need one version for vendor, IT, and finance.
14:32
After acceptance, contract and billing stay on the same link.
Commercial discipline
2,400+
Teams standardizing proposals
47%
Higher conversion on average
100%
Brand reflected in the template
1 link
From acceptance to contract and payment
When software sales stalls
The issue is rarely the demo—it is the gap between what discovery aligned and what the PDF shows. When technical scope and business narrative diverge, price becomes a fight in isolation.
Integrations, assumptions, and phases vanish into generic text. Finance sees a number; engineering does not see assumptions—so nobody signs with confidence.
A summary for the sponsor, details elsewhere, and a spreadsheet for procurement. Each channel becomes another version of the same scope.
Approval by email, charge in another system, contract somewhere else. Fragmentation invites delay.
Bring narrative, read signals, contract, and billing together in one artifact—with batch send, presentation mode, PDF, and section-level metrics. Customize per account while keeping standards; technical and economic buyers share one version.
What changes in operations
End-to-end commercial platform—AI, batch, presentation, PDF, metrics, AI chatbot, contract, Pix, recurring billing, and team by plan.
Structure technical scope in minutes; clone across opportunities; in QBR or POC review, present without exposing pricing until the right moment.
See what sponsors, IT, and finance actually opened. Time calls and negotiation with data—not gut feel.
Integration, timeline, and assumptions clarified in the same link. Less post-signature rework.
Your contract template and integrated billing; recurring agreements for SaaS and services. Operators on Scale.
Low-risk start
Free to validate. Essential, Growth, and Scale unlock Pix, chatbot, batch, presentation, contract, recurring billing, invoice, meeting audio, full branding, and collaborators—each with the package that fits your volume.
No lock-in · Support in English, Portuguese, and Spanish
Buyer experience
Interactive, responsive, on-brand. Clarity for budget owners and for whoever validates technical feasibility.

Fyrmo UI: interactive proposal with context and client actions
3-step flow
Less rework between presales and delivery. More predictability on what was committed.
Phases, assumptions, and pricing. AI builds a narrative aligned with what your team actually ships.
Logo, colors, and sections that match your company or product. Per-account nuance without losing visual governance.
One artifact for sponsor, IT, and finance—or batch sends. Opens, sections, AI chat, acceptance, contract, and payment tracked to the yes.
Demo · vertical 9:16 video
Screen recording of a proposal published on Fyrmo—the same in-browser experience B2B buyers get.
Demo uses a real proposal published at fyrmo.com.br
Product screens
Logged-in UI: wide dashboard plus portrait screens. Real captures—the same product you run and buyers see in the link.

Wide dashboard view inside Fyrmo

First portrait screen—internal flow

Second portrait—another in-app view
From the field
B2B teams and software houses that replaced fragmented PDFs with a live, trackable, integrated close.
Our proposal finally reflects product rigor. Engineering and finance review the same link; we cut back-and-forth before signature.
Section engagement showed where buyers stalled. We stopped following up blindly and led conversations with context.
We customize templates by segment without losing standards. For us, Fyrmo is commercial governance—not just speed.
Fyrmo vs fragmented process
What changes when the proposal stops being an attachment and becomes the experience.
| Fyrmo | PDF / email / loose sheets | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope and assumption clarity | Sections built around phases and deliverables | Generic bullets or price-only views |
| Post-send visibility | Opens and engagement by section | No read signal on a static PDF |
| Traceable close | Acceptance, contract, Pix, and recurring billing on one link | Email, tools, and bank separated |
FAQ
Yes. Teams selling implementation, license, dedicated squad, or fixed scope use it to align commercial story with real delivery.
No. The link opens in the browser—view, chat, accept, pay without mandatory signup, which helps reduce friction in B2B buying.
Yes. You organize sections, deliverables, and assumptions; AI helps write for both business and technical readers.
The proposal stays centralized for the customer’s internal review. You reduce parallel versions before formal acceptance.
The focus is buyer experience and closing on the link. Deeper integrations depend on your plan—talk to the Fyrmo team about your stack.
Stop competing on demo alone. Go from a live link to signature and billing without mirroring your process across five tools.
Create my free accountCancel anytime · Support in English, Portuguese, and Spanish